Founding Statement

Why Haus Europa exists, what it stands for, and what it will do

We live in today, but shape tomorrow. We’ve built a continent of conferences but forgotten how to build the future.

We all experience it, and we all seem to suffer from it. There is no shortage of ideas, pilots, or slide decks. What we lack is the muscle to turn those ideas into realities at scale. One loses count of pilots that withered in the last mile, not for lack of brilliance or budget, but because of a lack of functional, action-ready collaborations, skills, and stamina that implementation for evolving futures demands.

Across sectors, the pattern is stubborn. Decades of research on organizational change clearly say that transformative innovations succeed far less often than we think. Only about a third of innovations fully deliver, with people factors — leadership behaviour, ownership, and resistance — being why only a third succeed.

In Europe, the macro signals rhyme with those micro experiences. The European Investment Bank’s latest investment report and following business survey point to three barriers that prevent businesses from investing and thus achieving results: uncertainty about the future, a shortage of skilled workers, and regulatory burdens.

These obstacles show up whether you talk to SME manufacturers digitising their businesses or scale-ups trying to cross the chasm from pilot to procurement. The clear message: Europe does not lack innovative ideas or capital. But the conditions for turning innovative ideas into impact remain patchy and slow.

Today’s problems aren’t polite. AI is rewriting workflows faster than committees can write memoranda. Energy systems are in a once-in-a-century rebuild. Demographics and migration started shifting our everyday lives. In this context, implementing change seems less like “completing a plan” and more like undergoing intense and painful learning cycles and repeatedly striving for adoption within real constraints.

The practices that got us here won’t get us where we need to go. Even with advanced metrics, KPIs, and plans, too many innovations fade out. The problem isn’t effort inside old paradigms — it’s the paradigm itself. We’re trapped by various biases: confirmation bias that sees what we expect to see, survivorship bias that studies only successes, and present bias that assumes tomorrow will look like today. These mental models, these ways of thinking that once served us well, have become the very barriers to our evolution.

This raises a prior question: implement but toward what? Innovations and plans for their implementation should not be created by extrapolating the past or copying the present, but by understanding the future in which we will actually live.

However you label today — VUCA, BANI, PLUTO — the world is fast-changing, continuously evolving, and shaped by many forces, not only by the rapid adoption of AI. Implementation without understanding and a clear vision of the future easily optimizes for a context that will no longer exist.

The future we can imagine today shapes the future we’ll inhabit tomorrow. Our desires and their realization shape the development; we are the source of the future.

The task, then, is to clarify which plausible future we are creating for, and to keep that picture alive as conditions evolve. This is not about predicting a single outcome; it is about opening our minds, evolving our thinking patterns, exploring multiple futures, and aligning strategic collaborations around a shared direction of travel.

We live with a real tension: a strong individual drive inside an ever-tighter web of connection. As the world knits tighter, narrow self-interest underperforms. This isn’t about losing the self, but enlarging it — growing a me-and-we mindset that fits interdependence.

Innovation isn’t a thing; it’s a living function of time, place, and emerging needs. We must move beyond fixed endpoints and historical pattern analysis to anticipatory frameworks that respond to the rhythms of change itself. A solution that works in one context may fail in another, not because the idea is flawed but because the temporal-spatial dynamics are different. We need to read these dynamics like sailors read wind and currents — adjusting our approach to work with the forces at play, not against them.

This requires transcending isolated metrics to map, manage, and create interconnected value streams that generate impact across multiple system levels simultaneously. What we need are innovations that serve collective needs while honoring individual agency, that conserve resources while expanding possibilities, that create symbiotic relationships between previously competing elements. Innovations that generate value that compounds across system levels, that enable evolutionary advancement in human consciousness and capability, that emerge organically from within systems rather than being imposed from outside.

Crucially, innovation isn’t just about products. Some of Europe’s most meaningful advances are human and systemic, and their value lies precisely in how they’ve been implemented.

In Romania, the rural commune of Ciugud has become a national reference for “smart village” transformation: digitising local services, experimenting with smart recycling and energy, and using EU programmes to move from concept to concrete benefits for residents. This is what real transformative implementation looks like — the mayor’s office and community groups working through the unglamorous steps of adoption.

Consider Denmark’s reablement revolution, seeded in the municipality of Fredericia in 2008: short, goal-oriented support that helps older adults regain independence rather than defaulting to lifelong care. It’s a redesign of work and responsibility, not a gadget, and evaluations point to improved independence and changed care practices when the model is done well. That is implementation, not performance.

These examples show us something profound: the innovations that truly transform societies aren’t always the flashiest or most technologically advanced. They’re the ones that understand and work with the grain of human systems, that recognize how reach and equity determine real impact, that measure success not in isolated wins but in how widely benefits diffuse and adapt across contexts. They’re innovations that make the system itself smarter over time.

The transformation we seek unfolds through a natural progression, one that begins with seeing differently. When we truly see — not just look, but see — we begin to understand ourselves as part of larger wholes, to recognize how our individual needs are woven into collective needs, to surface the biases and patterns that have been invisible to us. This systemic awareness isn’t abstract philosophy; it’s the practical foundation for everything that follows.

From this expanded seeing comes a different quality of thinking. Not the linear, extrapolative thinking that got us here, but future-ready cognition that can hold paradoxes, recognize patterns across scales, and frame needs not in terms of what was but what could be. This is evolutionary thinking — doing fewer things with higher impact, thinking in terms of systemic added value rather than isolated victories.

But thinking alone changes nothing. The magic happens when individual insight transforms into collective intelligence, when the “I” becomes “we” through genuine integration. This isn’t about committee consensus or forced collaboration. It’s about designing solutions that build on our neurobiological hardwiring for connection, creating symbiotic relationships where different needs complement rather than compete. 

And then, finally, we create — not just another pilot that dies after funding ends, but innovations that grow stronger as they spread, that adapt to new contexts while maintaining their core purpose. We prototype and test and scale, yes, but always with an eye toward ensuring technology serves human connection rather than replacing it, measuring not just immediate outputs but implementation velocity and systemic ripple effects.

Perhaps the most difficult capability to develop is maintaining decisive action and clear strategic direction within complex systems, even when outcomes cannot be predetermined. This requires holding two seemingly contradictory states simultaneously: absolute clarity of purpose with complete flexibility of method.

This is what we call high agency — the capacity to act decisively despite uncertainty, to maintain bias toward action while building resilience to handle resistance, to sustain optimistic realism that maintains hope while confronting hard truths. It’s the ability to think systemically while acting pragmatically, to build on vulnerability while maintaining strength, to create for futures that don’t yet exist while working within present constraints.

High agency isn’t about heroic individual action. It’s about understanding oneself as an integral part of larger systems while maintaining the courage to act within them. It’s about transforming resistance into resource, connecting the disconnected, making the impossible increasingly inevitable through sustained, strategic action.

If we want more of this, we should change how and where we work — not just physical spaces but the influences on our thinking and abilities to effectively move ourselves and others forward. Each person needs slightly different conditions, yet we must find tools to connect rather than isolate from the places and people that are our destination and purpose.

Teams can make more progress in a week of serious, field-anchored problem-solving than in months of panel discussions. Why? Because future-ready implementation capability is learnable, but not in two-day workshops. It’s forged in sustained practice with real constraints and consequences: managing stakeholders who disagree, adapting tactics without losing the thread of purpose, and staying with the problem long enough to change behaviour.

We should design spaces for doing, not just discussing, and fund the full arc: from idea to pilot to adoption to scale, instead of stopping at the photo-ready prototype.

Even the setting matters. Take cross-sector groups out of the conference room and into nature, and something shifts. Hierarchies flatten. Focus returns. The context we choose can unlock the very capabilities implementation needs — attention, flexibility, and genuine collaboration.

There’s a reason that the intensive work of Haus Eurooa happens in Tux, Austria, at 1,300 meters elevation near the Hintertux Glacier. This isn’t about finding a beautiful conference venue — it’s about creating “enabling spaces” that operate across multiple dimensions simultaneously.

The physical space matters, yes — research shows that moderate altitude can modulate physiological and cognitive states, that natural environments restore directed attention fatigue, that walking enhances creative ideation. But it’s more than that. These spaces create cognitive conditions that enhance mental clarity and pattern recognition. They provide emotional safety that allows vulnerability and authentic expression. They foster social dynamics where trust-based relationships enable genuine collaboration. And perhaps most importantly, they create epistemological spaces — environments that challenge our fundamental assumptions about what we know and how we know it.

Nature becomes our co-creator in innovation. Alpine ecosystems embody adaptation, interdependence, and regeneration — patterns that participants naturally begin to translate into organizational design. The rhythm of the mountains teaches its own lessons: morning clarity supports strategic thinking, afternoon expansiveness enables exploration, evening reflection allows integration. Ascending teaches persistence and vision, descending grounds us in reality, traversing invites lateral thinking. Weather changes model uncertainty management in real time.

In these enabling spaces, emergent innovation arises naturally — not forced or manufactured, but grown from within when the right conditions are cultivated. This is fundamentally different from traditional innovation approaches that attempt to impose change from outside. It’s about creating conditions where context-appropriate, authentically aligned solutions can develop organically.

The Haus Europa journey unfolds for participants over 6-12 months as a carefully orchestrated hybrid experience. Throughout this extended period, intensive weeks in Tux punctuate ongoing digital engagement, creating a rhythm of breakthrough and integration. The digital platform isn’t just a supplement but an essential dimension of the transformation, providing structured modules that deepen the four phases of SEE, THINK, SOLVE, and CREATE. 

Virtual peer circles maintain cross-pollination of ideas across sectors, while implementation coaching helps innovations move from concept to reality. Participants face challenges together, solving problems in real-time, tracking progress, and holding each other accountable. 

The Alpine intensives provide breakthrough moments of clarity and connection, while the digital journey between and around these gatherings ensures continuous momentum and support. This hybrid approach recognizes that true transformation requires both the intensity of in-person collaboration in nature and the sustained engagement that only extended accompaniment can provide. The mountains and the digital realm work in concert, each amplifying the other’s impact as participants evolve from insight to implementation.

The direction of innovation is deeply shaped by lived experience — by gender, race, class, migration history, geography, and identity. When only a narrow slice of society participates in innovation, entire categories of needs and solutions remain unexplored. This exclusion doesn’t just limit individual potential; it holds back entire societies from developing solutions that could benefit all.

This isn’t about diversity as a nice-to-have or a moral imperative, though it is both. It’s about recognizing that homogeneous groups systematically miss innovation opportunities that diverse groups naturally see. The migrant entrepreneur sees friction points the native-born executive doesn’t notice. The working-class innovator understands needs the privileged designer can’t imagine. The artist brings perspectives the engineer would never consider.

That’s why democratizing access to innovation capacity isn’t charity — it’s strategy. It’s about removing financial barriers through scholarships, yes, but also about creating environments that honor different ways of knowing and being, that recognize wisdom doesn’t only come with certain credentials, that value lived experience as much as formal expertise.

Europe does not need another strategy document about innovation. We need an infrastructure for implementation focused on creating solutions with high systemic added value. In other words, we need evolutionarily advanced solutions with systemic impact.

That means investing in people who can navigate complexity, in environments that force practice, and in pathways that carry promising solutions across the valley from pilot to policy, from prototype to procurement, from case study to common sense, all this for an ever-evolving future.

This infrastructure isn’t built on traditional metrics and KPIs. It measures different things: how widely innovations spread and whose realities they change, progress toward higher-order integration rather than just immediate outputs, the quality and depth of connections formed rather than just the number of partnerships signed, the emergence of unexpected synergies rather than just planned outcomes. It tracks implementation velocity — how quickly transformative ideas reach first adoption, how smoothly they diffuse across contexts, who drives them forward, whose lives actually change.

None of this argues for reckless speed or for abandoning European values of consensus decision-making and due process. It argues for a different kind of discipline: one that backs doers and makers alongside thinkers, that supports the full journey from design to delivery, that recognizes implementation as a craft requiring its own expertise.

If we say we care about competitiveness, let’s be honest that the binding constraint is often implementation velocity rather than ideation. And if we say we care about cohesion, let’s widen who gets to innovate, because who innovates and implements shapes what gets built.

Change happens simultaneously across multiple levels, each reinforcing the others in a spiral of evolutionary development. Individual transformation enables team transformation, which shifts organizational culture, which redesigns systems themselves. But it doesn’t happen linearly or predictably. It emerges from the interaction of enabling spaces, diverse innovators, systemic methodology, and sustained implementation support.

This is why Haus Europa works with both individual innovators who return to their contexts as catalysts and intact organizational teams who can shift systems from within. Different theories of change, same underlying recognition: transformation accelerates when the conditions are right, when people have both the capabilities and the courage to act, when the pathway from insight to impact is clear and supported.

The future we’re creating isn’t just about better innovation outcomes. It’s about shifting innovation culture from ideation-heavy to implementation-obsessed, about proving that diversity drives better solutions, about bridging the divides between business, government, civil society, and arts. It’s about evolving leadership itself — from fear-based control to vulnerability-based courage, from ego-centric thinking to eco-centric understanding, from competition to symbiosis.

The Haus Europa approach doesn’t emerge from a vacuum. It builds on robust theoretical foundations and decades of research from leading academics, experts, and Nobel laureates across disciplines. From systems theory, complexity science, and applied psychology to implementation research and vulnerability studies, from attention restoration theory to emergent innovation frameworks, our methodology integrates proven knowledge about how change happens. 

The approach of Haus Europa stands on the shoulders of giants: economists who reimagined public value, psychologists who mapped optimal experience, futurists who teach us to think beyond linear time, and practitioners who proved transformation is possible. These are just examples of the collective wisdom we synthesize and apply to the implementation challenge of our time, always acknowledging the intellectual heritage that makes our work possible while contributing our own learnings back to the knowledge commons.

The challenges facing our societies — climate change, inequality, technological disruption, social fragmentation — require innovations that actually work in practice and address the needs of all society’s members. These challenges won’t wait for us to perfect our ideas in isolation.

The formula is clear: What got us here won’t get us further. The remedy? Evolution of thinking toward systemic innovations and understanding of cause-and-effect relationships.

At Haus Europa, we believe this approach will open new opportunities for Europe in the world, and will be one of the ways to address current gaps in European competitiveness, create new avenues for global collaboration, and tackle global societal challenges. That answer won’t come from another conference. It will come from which innovations will be developed, who will develop them, and how well they will be implemented.

We need to shift from innovations that solve problems to innovations that evolve with emerging realities. This requires not just new tools, but a fundamental transformation in how we think about value, implementation, and the future itself.

This is the mission of Haus Europa: to make change stick by developing changemakers who turn innovation into real-world results that shift the status quo, with technology as a partner and human judgment in charge. To create the infrastructure for implementation that Europe needs, one that builds the capabilities, connections, and courage required to turn our collective imagination into collective impact.

Join us if you believe what got us here won’t get us there. If you understand that who innovates shapes what gets implemented. If you know that vulnerability is the birthplace of true innovation. If you recognize that we’re all in the same boat — we row together or drown. If you see that the future belongs to those who can integrate opposites, that technology must serve human connection rather than replace it, that every system can better serve society’s needs.

Come not just to learn, but to become. Not just an innovator, but an implementation architect and engineer capable of thinking systemically while acting pragmatically, of building on vulnerability while maintaining strength, of creating for futures that don’t yet exist, of transforming resistance into resource, of connecting the disconnected, of making the impossible inevitable.

The world has plenty of ideas. What’s missing is their functional implementation. What’s missing is all of us, working not harder within old paradigms but differently within new ones.

Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom. In our collective response lies our future.

Paths are made by walking. Let’s walk together.

What does the Haus Europa logo mean?
It combines mountains and houses in one mark. From Europe’s mountain regions, it stands for care that becomes courage: we look after our homes and steward Europe as our shared home. The rising lines signal our intent: to mobilize future-ready innovation that moves beyond talk, shifts the status quo, and delivers real change.